[REF] stock_picking_batch_collect: rename and drop the aplicoop dependency
"custom" said nothing about what the module does. It is really about collecting goods into baskets: the extra detailed-operation columns, the is_collected flag, the Product Summary tab, the per-company validation restrictions and the Basket Assembly operator view all serve that one job. Rename it accordingly. Invert the dependency while at it. A generic warehouse addon was dragging in an entire eCommerce application, and the whole coupling was a single field: stock.move.line.home_delivery, related to picking_id.home_delivery. Everything else was already duck-typed. website_sale_aplicoop now depends on this module and injects its own consumer group columns into these views. This removes duplicated logic rather than relocating it: stock.picking .batch_consumer_group_id re-derived from sale_id a value aplicoop already stored as stock.picking.consumer_group_id, and the duplicate carried no @api.depends, so it never recomputed reliably. The batch transfers list now shows the stored field, which is sortable and groupable. The two aplicoop tests that probed information_schema for the res_company batch_* columns can drop that guard: a real dependency guarantees them. Renaming an addon is not something a migrations/ script can do, since a renamed addon is a brand new module to Odoo and its migration scripts never run. A pre_init_hook does it instead: it fires on install after the Python is imported but before registry.load(), which is the window where remapping ir_model_data makes Odoo reuse the existing tables and columns. is_collected, the summary line table and the company settings all survive untouched. Two details the hook has to get right: - ir_model_constraint.module and ir_model_relation.module are integer FKs with ON DELETE CASCADE, so they must be repointed before the old module row is deleted or the bookkeeping goes with it. - Deleting an ir_model_data row does not cascade to the record it points at. Artifacts handed over to aplicoop only need the xmlid dropped, but artifacts that disappear need the record deleted too, or the field survives as an orphan manual field and the view as a custom view referencing it. Verified against a restored copy of the dev database: 50 xmlids moved, 19 summary lines and 5 collected move lines preserved, no orphans, both test suites green, and the module installs cleanly on a database without website_sale_aplicoop. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
704f0def1b
commit
ef1283be7c
42 changed files with 926 additions and 709 deletions
|
|
@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
|
|||
# Copyright 2026 Criptomart
|
||||
# License AGPL-3.0 or later (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl).
|
||||
{ # noqa: B018
|
||||
"name": "Stock Picking Batch Custom",
|
||||
"version": "18.0.1.0.0",
|
||||
"category": "Warehouse",
|
||||
"summary": "Extra columns for batch detailed operations",
|
||||
"author": "Odoo Community Association (OCA), Criptomart",
|
||||
"maintainers": ["Criptomart"],
|
||||
"website": "https://github.com/Criptomart",
|
||||
"license": "AGPL-3",
|
||||
"depends": [
|
||||
# A quantity typed by the operator is the weighed one: it must not be
|
||||
# re-reserved by the scheduler.
|
||||
"stock_move_manual_quantity",
|
||||
"stock_picking_batch",
|
||||
# Ensure our related fields to sale/picking (home_delivery, pickup_slot_label)
|
||||
# are available by depending on the Aplicoop website_sale extension.
|
||||
"website_sale_aplicoop",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"data": [
|
||||
"security/ir.model.access.csv",
|
||||
"views/res_config_settings_views.xml",
|
||||
"views/stock_picking_batch_views.xml",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"assets": {
|
||||
"web.assets_backend": [
|
||||
"stock_picking_batch_custom/static/src/css/stock_picking_batch.css",
|
||||
],
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue