website_membership_signup_required: fix token signup name fields

This commit is contained in:
Luis 2026-07-23 18:40:29 +02:00
parent ba52c72b78
commit c439607ce1
3 changed files with 82 additions and 1 deletions

View file

@ -2,4 +2,5 @@
from . import website
from . import res_config_settings
from . import res_partner
from . import res_users

View file

@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
# License AGPL-3.0 or later (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl).
from odoo import api, models
class ResPartner(models.Model):
_inherit = "res.partner"
@api.model
def _signup_retrieve_info(self, token):
"""Extend the core's token-based signup info with `firstname` and
`lastname` so the signup form (extended by this module to collect
them separately via `partner_firstname`) can be pre-filled and
shown readonly when the visitor follows an invitation link.
The core (`auth_signup/models/res_partner.py:_signup_retrieve_info`)
only returns `name`, `login` and `email`. Our signup template
replaced the single `name` input with `firstname` / `lastname`
inputs, so without this override those inputs would be empty (and
readonly, because `only_passwords` is True for token flows) when
an invited partner already has the split fields populated.
We keep `name` in the returned dict (the core's contract) and add
the two split fields so the controller's `setdefault` populates
the qcontext transparently.
"""
res = super()._signup_retrieve_info(token)
partner = self._get_partner_from_token(token)
if partner:
res["firstname"] = partner.firstname or ""
res["lastname"] = partner.lastname or ""
return res

View file

@ -227,4 +227,52 @@ class TestMembershipSignup(TransactionCase):
ctrl = WebsiteSaleMembershipSignup()
billing_fields = ctrl._get_mandatory_billing_address_fields(country)
self.assertNotIn("phone", billing_fields)
self.assertIn("email", billing_fields)
self.assertIn("email", billing_fields)
# -- Token-based signup: pre-fill firstname / lastname -----------------
def test_12_signup_retrieve_info_returns_firstname_lastname(self):
"""When a partner is invited via token (the email-invitation flow),
the core's `_signup_retrieve_info` only returns `name`. Our
`res.partner` override adds `firstname` / `lastname` so the signup
form (extended by this module to collect them separately) is
pre-filled when the invited partner already has the split fields
(which is the case with `partner_firstname` installed).
The invited partner must NOT have a user yet, otherwise the token
payload check (`user_ids`) won't match.
"""
partner = self.env["res.partner"].create({
"firstname": "Invited",
"lastname": "Researcher",
"email": "invited.researcher@example.com",
"signup_type": "signup",
})
self.assertFalse(partner.user_ids, "test precondition: no user yet")
token = partner._generate_signup_token()
info = self.env["res.partner"]._signup_retrieve_info(token)
self.assertEqual(info.get("firstname"), "Invited")
self.assertEqual(info.get("lastname"), "Researcher")
self.assertEqual(info.get("name"), partner.name)
self.assertEqual(info.get("email"), "invited.researcher@example.com")
def test_13_signup_retrieve_info_legacy_partner_without_split(self):
"""A partner created without `firstname`/`lastname` (legacy, only
`name`) should not crash the override. `firstname`/`lastname` come
back as '' (falsy), `name` as the legacy value, and the token flow
still works the form will show empty readonly inputs for the split
fields, which is the best we can do without re-splitting.
"""
partner = self.env["res.partner"].create({
"name": "Legacy Researcher",
"email": "legacy@example.com",
"signup_type": "signup",
})
# partner_firstname's post_create hook may or may not have split
# `name` automatically; we just check the override does not crash
# and returns the contract keys.
token = partner._generate_signup_token()
info = self.env["res.partner"]._signup_retrieve_info(token)
self.assertIn("firstname", info)
self.assertIn("lastname", info)
self.assertEqual(info.get("name"), partner.name)